Keith Lusher 06.23.26

Michigan fishermen are ringing alarm bells as two newly introduced state House bills could dramatically expand commercial fishing opportunities on the Great Lakes by allowing netters to target popular gamefish like walleye and lake trout.
house bill 5801 And 5802Introduced by state representatives Dave Prestin and Jason Morgan, the bill would loosen long-standing restrictions on Michigan’s commercial fishing industry. For decades, commercial operations in the state have primarily targeted lake whitefish and yellow perch. But with both species experiencing significant declines, commercial fishermen are now looking for access to other fish populations.
The proposed legislation would allow commercial harvesting of species including walleye, lake trout and even crappie, a fish that is currently protected from commercial harvest in the rest of the United States.
The bills were immediately criticized by fishermen, conservation groups and fishing organizations who fear the move could undo decades of fisheries restoration efforts.
“The potential harm this could cause not only to our Great Lakes fish populations, but also to the industry that supports sport fishing, could impact Michigan for decades,” said Richard Benson, president of the Sports Fishing Association. Lake St. Clair Walleye Association.
Many opponents point to history as a warning. Commercial overharvest played a major role in the decline of lake trout populations throughout the Great Lakes during the twentieth century. Restoration efforts funded by fishermen, state agencies, and conservation organizations have spent decades rebuilding those fisheries.
A major concern is the use of gill nets, which critics describe as one of the least selective fishing methods available. Gill nets catch fish by their gills and often kill non-target species such as northern pike, muskellunge and other gamefish that encounter the net.
Mark Sak, a Michigan fishing advocate and Freshwater Fishing Hall of Fame member, said the proposed law would allow commercial operators to use both gill nets and trawling methods.
“Gill nets kill many other species of fish like pike and muskie,” Sak said. “There is no catch-and-release when using gill nets.”
Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation The U.S. has also opposed the legislation, arguing that expansion of commercial netting would jeopardize one of the country’s most valuable recreational fisheries.
Supporters of recreational fishing point to the massive economic gap between the two industries. According to figures cited by Michigan fisheries officials and conservation groups, recreational fishing generates approximately $3.9 to $4 billion annually for Michigan’s economy. By comparison, commercial fishing generates about $5 million annually.
Critics argue that managing fish populations primarily for commercial harvest rather than recreational opportunity could jeopardize tourism, tackle sales, guide services, boat dealers, hotels, restaurants, and countless other businesses that benefit from fishermen’s visits.
Bills were heard recently Michigan House Committee on Natural Resources and Tourism. As the debate continues, many fishermen are concerned that these proposals could lead to a significant change in the management of the country’s key freshwater fisheries.
Currently, the legislation is under consideration, but opposition from Michigan’s fishing community continues to grow.